The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and therefore if you don't have that level of stress it doesn't matter what else you do you ain't you ain't gonna get flanks developing because the endothelium just goes well you know there might be smoking there might be there might be high blood sugar level but frankly I don't care because there's not much going on around here and I'm not going to fall off and gets tripped up under this kind of pressure
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.