The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the risks are that it's a small amount of radiation two M C verts like you said is around the level that you're going to get in a year of living on the planet um it's pretty darn low um and the benefits are that it will tell us how much calcified plaque is in your arteries
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what you get from a CTA is uh is Clarity and more information which in most cases is really really good and that comes at a small cost uh in terms of increased radiation uh and I guess you know some potential risk of the of the contrast although it's relatively small