The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in the end i don't typically rescan patients if i have a 50 year old who shows up with a calcium score of 100 i have all the answer i need to know which is we need to be way more aggressive and there's nothing i'm going to glean by rescanning you next year to find out your 120 versus 80 it will not change our management
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.