The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
We went through this entire period of five or seven years of trying to find ways to solve restenosis. including radiating the inside of the vessel wall. So, but when I was a cardiology fellow, we'd have the radiation oncologist come into the cath lab with us and we would put these radioactive beads up like in one of these balloon catheters into somebody's artery and basically try to almost kill the fibroblasts and other cells that were gonna make the scar tissue.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.