The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
yes is the supraspinatus that wide relatively speaking yeah it's pretty wide wow so maybe maybe more about here here it is uh let I drew it a little wide there okay but that's interesting again in an anatomic diagrams because you're looking at it from the front it looks like a tiny little muscle yes but it's broad it has three dimensionality and that's about three roughly three three and a half centimeters of width going to back wow okay great
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.