The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so that is basically was described by a Stanford urologist Tom stamy and that effectively um was that you would capture urine as it comes out the urethra in different phases and therefore you could track where that urine came from so it's actually a four-step process
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the first step would be to capture urine immediately after you start voiding that would then capture and wash out any bacteria within the urethra the the long Channel between the bladder and the tip of your penis right so that first few CC of urine that comes into the it gives you a sense for is there any bacteria growing in the urethra urethritis y
the second phase would be um you would wait a couple seconds and then capture urine um Midstream coming out from the bladder this is you know if and then you could then determine is there an infection in the bladder yep