Paul Saladino· MD
just because you can do an autopsy on someone and show an early atherosclerotic lesion a fatty streak doesn't mean that that's going to develop into clinically relevant atherosclerosis and stenosis and an unstable plaque
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
just because you can do an autopsy on someone and show an early atherosclerotic lesion a fatty streak doesn't mean that that's going to develop into clinically relevant atherosclerosis and stenosis and an unstable plaque
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the real way to think about this is to and I think Ron and I talked about this at length in the podcast is to look at a pathology textbook when you look at the autopsies you'll get a sense of what's going on long before you have luminal narrowing which may or may not accompany a problem you have a very clear documented path of what this disease does