The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the studies that are unambiguous as you said are the ones that actually measure VO2 max because there's no denying what you're measuring it's a very objective measurement and it basically takes out the training component because it captures that benefit it's the readout state of the training
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but this the studies that are unambiguous as you said are the ones that actually measure VO2 max because there's no denying what you're measuring it's a very objective measurement and it basically takes out the training component because it captures that benefit it's the readout state of the training