The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
it is extraordinarily associated with uh high cholesterol for people have monogenetic FH we haven't yet talked about monogenetic versus polygenetic but monogenetic FH typically has a high association with these levels of xanthomas that are not xanthelasmas but are you know typically on on tendons and and knees and all kinds of places
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but for xanthomas like tendon xanthomas or eruptive xanthomas that might show up in your hands or in back of your ankles I'm very interested in those
that could be a sign of something um that could be much more concerning and I'd want people to look at it
xanthomas probably are more pathic of something like familial hyper lipidemia