The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so even now you have way way way more LDL particles you know an average person might have an ldl-p of 1200 nals so and you might have an LP little a of aund nanal and you would say oh that's that's a minor particle yes but if it's eight times more atherogenic than in LDL it's a bad news particle so it's like the the not everybody's a criminal in our country but it doesn't take a lot of criminals to cause a lot of Havoc so it's a terribly dangerous inherited type of lipoprotein
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.