The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when there's a calcium oxalate is forming and it's sticking to the tubule cells which it does the cells will eat the crystal right phagocytosis they'll eat the crystal and they'll put it back in what we call the interstitial space so we were stashing oxalate back in the kidney tissues and you get this nephrocalcinosis if this keeps going on where the you get diffuse calcification in the kidneys
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.