The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so it turns out stents became very popular for chronic stable angina and i knew in the years in which i was a resident that we had just had a large mega randomized control trial called courage that asked whether or not stents lower the rate of heart attack or improve longevity and the answer was for people with chronic stable angina not that acute heart attack but this sort of chest pain that comes on when you shovel your driveway there was
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.