Peter Attia· MD
but when your blood pressure is like 130 over 135 over 85 um I don't I haven't seen any evidence that anti-hypertensives really provide long-term benefit to that group
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
but when your blood pressure is like 130 over 135 over 85 um I don't I haven't seen any evidence that anti-hypertensives really provide long-term benefit to that group
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but it shouldn't confuse the underlying physiology right yeah I totally agree with you on the physiology part I think if the um if you use these more stringent definitions of hypertension then suddenly a very large number of adults have hypertension and and if you then say that they need treatment for it in terms of like an anti-hypertensive then you're talking about probably the majority of the population