The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i have so many patients who've been through when by the time they come to me as a cancer patient they've been through so many CT scans and nowadays we do PET scans we follow up with annual PET scans after the fact which are not only the CT but you've got a radioactive isotope that's being injected into them and we just really don't see
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I I think honestly a a 20% of my patients opt not to do whole body MRI. Yes. Um, and I fully endorse that decision and I try to talk p patients out of it.