The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there is the lipid hypothesis as we all understand it to be to be context independent that whatever the population you're going to see relatively a higher plaque burden compared to a likewise population if the LDL and particularly the apob is higher
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
apob is a contextual risk factor for a cardiovascular disease I don't believe it's causal in the way that the lipid hypothesis which suggest that it's causal