The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
to me the the presence of the furan cleavage site uh which to your point makes this much more infectious than sars one you had commented that uh that sars one you know it's it transmits through the ace um the ace2 receptor uh well this is on the order of like an order of magnitude more transmissible because that s1 s2 subunit is cleaved and now it has an enormous affinity for that h2 receptor
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.