The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
now of course there you're measuring genotype and not phenotype we don't measure the phenotype of apoe yet so here you have so many genes that are associated with this thing that if the parents are both elevated the probability that the offspring are going to be elevated seems pretty high if one parent is elevated and the other is not there's a pretty decent chance that the offspring will not
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.