The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I've had people send me data on their having done that the same so you've been sent data that people had persistently high LDL and then had reduction in coronary artery calcium scoring or other indices of regression of atherosclerosis
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I have a number of clients who have had persistently negative coronary artery calcium scores despite highly elevated LDL
that on a high-fat diet a high saturated fat diet with higher LDL you can get regression of your CAC that's a pretty fascinating finding