The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the same thing is true for ankle sprains and fractures around the ankle it's because that joint is so congruent that car in the ankle isn't even that thick it's so congruent that if you don't have an injury to the ankle that ankle can last you quite a long time it doesn't have the same incidence as hip and knee arthritis
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the cartilage in the ankle isn't even that thick it's so congruent that if you don't have an injury to the ankle that ankle can last you quite a long time it doesn't have the same incidence as hip and knee arthritis
the knee which is in the middle it could that weight could go through the inside or the outside the ankle it's right down the center because that's where the Plumb line goes so there's not a lot of play because it's closer to the floor