The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in science magazine two excellent science journalist gretchen vogel and and kai cooper schmidt looked at this and you know have identified about you know they wrote about 31 cases of cerebral venous thrombosis and you know clearly you know more clearly showing it it could be linked to the vaccine as a very rare event
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.