The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think he as far as i' I've heard from him is yes like when you get to this like elite elite athlete endurance athlete level I mean there some of the increased risks to to do with like coronary calcification whatever the you know the increased risks of that outcome are are actually even lower even if the C coronary calcification is a little bit higher do you know what I mean so it's like their card their risk of cardiovascular death is still lower
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.