The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So then people fast forward and you were in the drug-eluting stent era and we've solved the restenosis problem, but people are showing up now. They've taken their Plavix for a month, but now they're showing up at three months, six months, nine months with not subacute, but whatever the after subacute is, stent thrombosis, late stent thrombosis, and having, again, the same life-threatening STEMI-like experience.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.