The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so it's these massive swings and these big particularly these big Peaks that are occurring they're tightly linked to atheroma development and people that are as corrosive and or where they actually have an event so like fasting blood sugar is definitely important but it's those swings and those those Peaks after meals that are probably more important
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if your blood sugar is spiking more than definitely more than fifty milligrams per deciliter but maybe more than thirty milligrams per deciliter after a meal that variability in blood sugar is much more tightly relinked tightly linked to things like cardiovascular disease