Peter Attia· MD
and it's really the genetic association studies that have uh kind of resurrected the field of lpa and these were published in 2009 to 2011
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and it's really the genetic association studies that have uh kind of resurrected the field of lpa and these were published in 2009 to 2011
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there were three big studies published in 2009 that have very convincingly shows that genetic variants associated with high lpa levels we're tracking with with cardiovascular events
the great thing about genetic studies is that you don't necessarily need to measure uh lipoprotein a level so you can look at genetic variants at common genetic variants that are associated with diseases and there were three big studies published in 2009 that have very convincingly shows that genetic variants associated with high LPA levels we're tracking with with cardiovascular events