The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And I really believe in looking at the literature, and also after I do this, I then measure...well, I've measured my glucose, and my blood pressure comes down and it seems to be...I'm like my blood pressure is like the lowest it's ever been, it's like 97 over 60 or something or 58 or something. It's really low.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I always trended on the higher end of systolic especially like 130, 140. I think during grad school was like 145 consistently systolic pressure, always ran a little bit higher systolic, although I carried more mass at the time. But the one thing that has really moved the needle