The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the degree of information that is there supporting the idea that high LDL after age 50 actually is a marker of better health so we can ill straight a few studies so that you know people get a little bit of an idea that as to where we are coming from
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I have pointed out in some of my presentation about the Leiden 85 plus trial done in Netherlands in which people 85 and older were taken and divided into cholesterol subgroups high cholesterol was 250 to 300 middle cholesterol was 200 to 250 and low cholesterol less than 200 and uniformly the groove that lived longer the groove that had lower cancer mortality lower all cause mortality lower rates of pneumonias because as you