Paul Saladino· MD
So the CT angiogram is for the right population. You know you're a little bit more risk averse. You don't necessarily want to take statin therapy or you know your calcium score is zero, but you have other risk factors.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
So the CT angiogram is for the right population. You know you're a little bit more risk averse. You don't necessarily want to take statin therapy or you know your calcium score is zero, but you have other risk factors.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But if you're building up a lot of soft plaque in your artery that hasn't yet calcified and you're going around saying, "I have a calcium score of zero, but my LDL-C is 500." You still may have a very big problem. And you should probably do something like the CT coronary angio, like the clearly CTI.
I've seen numerous people with calcium scores of zero who go do the CT angiogram and even get the clearly analysis. They still have zero calcification in the plaque, but they still have at least mild amount of soft plaque in the coronary arteries. So the risk is probably a little bit higher than they knew and so maybe they're going to be a little bit more aggressive with certain lifestyle modifications.
And in that case seems like you'd want to have a CT coronary angio to really fill in the data on like what's happening to your to your plaques and rather than being confused with the CAC.
I really need to do is get a CT coronary angiogram
but when it is zero doesn't change the fact that you live in a bad neighborhood and it doesn't change the fact that you can have lots of arterial damage that just hasn't shown up at the stage of calcification so you can have plenty of soft plaque that's still there without calcification that's still an enormous marker of risk and that doesn't get picked up with no