The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think there's a I'm not going to say 100 but I think there's a more than 50 percent chance that we're going to see at least some assay come out that will allow us to do that and then it will be you know frankly Physicians like yourself and like Tom Day Spring who pick up that assay and start using it in their patients and start trying to get a sense for whether it's useful in the context of a sophisticated preventive clinical practice
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.