The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and their only option honestly in that situation is to do what's called crossclamp the aorta so they actually have to take literally as ridiculous as that sounds you take a big clamp and you go above the diaphragm they might even open your chest and they put a clamp across the aorta
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and what that does is it absolutely stops any blood flow below point so the good news is your heart is going to be fine because your heart gets perused above the aorta your head is fine those are the two most important things and what's going to happen is your kidneys are going to start dying everything below the body is going to be is going to have no perfusion um but that buys them enough time to find what's wrong