The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
and then it gets really complicated when you start looking at the lipids because then the lipid hypothesis gets tied into this and the idea that LDL cholesterol uh is is bad for humans or is directly injurious to the endothelium
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the real honest-to-goodness no [ __ ] LDL hypothesis which again I've written about eloquently and I people have written about it far more eloquently I should say I've written about it in a kludgy way others have written about it eloquently the lipoprotein the endothelial damage the inflammatory changes all of these things cascading