The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you were to give me the same numbers let me make this easier I've Craig Moffitt's who's very close to this except that his triglycerides are much lower mm-hmm if it was the same one then I would I would wonder if there really was a risk yeah okay so
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if a 40-year-old shows up has a calcium scan of zero haven't really learned a lot and if a calcium scan of zero in a 40-year-old is accompanied by other risk factors I would not be dissuaded from aggressively treating those risk factors