Peter Attia· MD
that means starting earlier and lowering apob or LDL cholesterol more and the longer you wait the more it puts the burden on you to really lower that apob
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
that means starting earlier and lowering apob or LDL cholesterol more and the longer you wait the more it puts the burden on you to really lower that apob
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So on the x axis you have LDLC going down right so from 160 140 120 you know 100 80 60 so descending LDLC and on the y- axis you have mortality cardiovascular mortality so not surprisingly all of these point down as LDLC goes lower uh mort cardiovascular mortality goes lower
you can see that lower lifelong exposure to apob or LDL produces lower ascvd risk over a lifetime