The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
atherosclerosis certainly seems like it could be a part of a normal process of repair of the arteries and I love that you're suggesting that it's just a balance between how much is happening sort of this over this turnover of the repair if the repair gets to be too great or the repair gets slowed down we run into problems
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
atherosclerosis this formation of small plaques or this subintimal LDL or these foam cells maybe this is part of normal vessel repair and the problem is that not that the atherosclerosis is happening occasionally it's part of a normal healing process like a scab it's that in a lot of people it just gets way out of control
I I think of these plaques as a process of repair and that when they become like you said these zits or these kind of these festering you know inflamed things, there's something impairing that repair or continuing to to damage and irritate the tissue. If if you can create a situation in your artery wall the most valuable knee and elbow that you have in your body quote unquote where the body can just repair that that scar, repair that wound I think it's very possible that that could happen.