Peter Attia· MD
your time horizon is different and and i and i think that that's what those studies are we use 20 30 years okay i think the 10-year if you're 45 you want to get to further than 55.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
your time horizon is different and and i and i think that that's what those studies are we use 20 30 years okay i think the 10-year if you're 45 you want to get to further than 55.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
your time horizon is different and and i and i think that that's what when those studies are we we use 20 30 years okay i think the 10-year if you're 45 you want to get to further than 55. your career your children your your enjoyment of things surely you're not just planning to age 55. and you should be thinking well what am i going to be like at 65 or 75 that's reasonable
I think the 10e if you're 45 you want to get to further than 55 your your career your children your your enjoyment of things surely you're not just planning to age 55 and you should be thinking well what am I going to be like at 65 or 75 that's reasonable and it's also by taking it out to that you can get to numbers that are really meaningful