We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
it's a kind of explanation to kind of continue to make the LDL hypothesis continue to live on but it doesn't work for me maybe there is some damage from oxidized LDL but compared to say smoking a cigarette it's like I don't know what it's like I could use analogous but it's it's just that's all this tiniest thing versus huge gigantic thing it's grasping at the tiniest straw to maintain I go this is in my opinion
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.