The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you calculate the number of particles LDL particles in someone's body who has an LDL of 70 milligrams per deciliter which you know 99% of cardiologists in this country would say that's fantastic that number is still astronomically large like ten to the sixteenth ten to the sixteenth particles of LDL floating around in your bloodstream in my bloodstream when we have an LDL of 70 milligrams per deciliter
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you said in angstroms it it's 24.7 240 247 that is astronomically high