The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the conventional ways of taking things apart with prospective observational studies like Framingham there's a limited amount of the certainty of your conclusions because of confounding you can't deal with you take measurements at age 20 and you follow someone for the next 30 Years well a lot of things change in the next 30 years that you don't have a
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.