Peter Attia· MD
but the reason you treat causal risk factors um is not because you are sure that this person is going to get ASBD, but because you understand that by treating something that's causal, you reduce the risk.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but the reason you treat causal risk factors um is not because you are sure that this person is going to get ASBD, but because you understand that by treating something that's causal, you reduce the risk.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.