The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you've got a higher I mean relative we're talking we're not talking about like you know 10% more 20% more we're talking about a number of people who have LDL particle counts that are well into the 1% of the population it should periid hypothesis and comparing going back to Brown and Goldstein comparing like I know personally now around I want to say 15 to 17 people who have an LDL comparable to that little girl have an LDL around 700
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.