The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
because you're closer to the organ you want to see being the heart the details can be fantastic because one of the other things with ultrasound is that the deeper you go the beam effectively fans out and gets thinner and thinner so you actually get less sort of detail on the edges whereas right in the center right underneath the probe is where your maximum amount of detail is gonna be
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.