We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
it is for that reason as you said that it is no longer a formal recommendation around the use of PSA screening it is now kind of been relegated to the just talk to your doctor about it um and of course um you know the thinking is look there are too many men that have undergone an unnecessary prostate biopsy on the basis of an elevated PSA that you know really should have been attributed to their BPH or prostatitis or something else U
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.