Peter Attia· MD
so two is inadequate because the needle can bend it can deflect sometimes the needle is going in 20 cm beyond your hand so you have to account for the deflection
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
so two is inadequate because the needle can bend it can deflect sometimes the needle is going in 20 cm beyond your hand so you have to account for the deflection
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.