Peter Attia· MD
research will say two weeks and at the most up to a year and then it's time to get out of those things
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
research will say two weeks and at the most up to a year and then it's time to get out of those things
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Orthotics often can help in those initial stages of an acute injury because because you are offloading and let's just explain to people again I'm sorry I'm all over the place but the anatomy here is so complicated that I think it helps to talk about pathology to explain it the reason an orthotic can be acutely helpful is because it prevents the full collapse of the arch therefore it takes some of the stretch off the planter fascia
when you talk about what exactly an orthotic does the jury's still out on that but we know it has something to do with Force so when the foot starts to unlock right it's going to it's a load modifier an orthotic is a load modifier so it's going to modify the load that's occurring at the heel so in an acute situation that's great