The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the vast majorities patients will not get a cancer from their imaging or radiation treatment and their cancer if we leave it untreated will kill them right and so or if we don't catch if it's going to come back if we don't catch it early where we still might have a chance to a second chance a cure so that's how we you know we do the calculus
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i would certainly not skimp on on uh dental x-rays mammograms
the potential the risk benefit ratio is so heavily in favor of doing these studies that I don't even think twice about them
the potential the risk benefit ratio is so heavily in favor of doing these studies that I don't even think twice about them