The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the uh fmr itself conveys more risk even than smoking status and and that's a pretty amazing finding right that if you have a high fmr mean you have a lot of fat up here and not very much fat down here that your risk of significant bad things in the form of coronary disease events is higher than it would be even if you smoked cigarettes which is astonishing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.