Peter Attia· MD
you have bed rest for a week which can be disastrous uh and you lose seven percent in the course of a week and you only get two percent back
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
you have bed rest for a week which can be disastrous uh and you lose seven percent in the course of a week and you only get two percent back
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
three weeks of bed rest can have a more detrimental impact on fitness than 30 years of aging.
what they found was that their cardiorespiratory Fitness after 30 years of Aging was no worse than their cardiorespiratory Fitness after three weeks of bed rest 30 years ago so essentially three weeks of bed rest is worse for your cardiovascular health for your cardiorespiratory Fitness than 30 years of aging