We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
so that failed so but you know there were people in the past that Peter talked about he gave a case where a woman had very high HDL cholesterol but had coronary atherosclerosis but there is a bunch of people out there with very high HDL cholesterol who don't have car I'm gonna theorize in retrospect maybe a Poe he's got something to do with that but I don't know that cuz that would enhance their clearing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.