The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you can actually also pick off the frequency that's different between oxygenated arterial blood and deoxygenated venous blood and so that comes into a different sequence called SWI or susceptibility weighted imaging where you can actually look at the deoxygenation status of venous blood and you can get spectacular contrast for the small blood vessels in the brain using that sequence
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.