Peter Attia· MD
but I clearly see quite a bit of uncoupling I checked that number quite a bit because some of my patients have a family history of coronary disease but many of them have normal LP lays and still Scott high insulin resistance
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but I clearly see quite a bit of uncoupling I checked that number quite a bit because some of my patients have a family history of coronary disease but many of them have normal LP lays and still Scott high insulin resistance
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.