Paul Saladino· MD
now you also said your particle count is uh very high 3500 plus
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
now you also said your particle count is uh very high 3500 plus
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
If I recall best risk was if that ratio was less than 35?
is greater than 3500 it's like we're sorry our machines can't process LDL particles as high as you
all things equal we would love to see a lower LDL particle number because the process by which those particles enter the space seems relatively stochastic
there's no question that the number of LDL particles is a more accurate index of risk than the LDL cholesterol